Why should there be a child benefit and not a celibacy allowance?
#1
Government REWARDS some families because the father didn't put a condom on. He gets a money prize for having unprotected sex with his wife.
This legal framework is cancer to society. Instead of making money to ensure he can afford having kids, he goes and cums
in his wife's pussy because he knows that the government will give him the allowance to raise the offsprings. Multi child families LEECH off society.
If these people wanted so badly to have 3 or more kids then they should make sure to become rich enough on their own
in order to raise them. Society rewards them for having sex and encourages laziness.

Incels, on the other hand, are the main wheels of the world economy. They work like slaves to sustain society and receive no benefits for it.
Incels DESERVE a celibacy allowance. We will never have sex but we are entitled to government money. If multi child families can have child
benefit then we should have a celibacy benefit as well.
Reply
#2
There shouldn't be. But the government doesn't want ugly men using the betabux loophole to reproduce, so they're pushing for the welfare state to make sure little Chadlets get to be born and grow up no matter what.
Quality over quantity.
Reply
#3
(11-08-2017, 03:59 PM)Angry_runt Wrote: There shouldn't be. But the government doesn't want ugly men using the betabux loophole to reproduce, so they're pushing for the welfare state to make sure little Chadlets get to be born and grow up no matter what.

Why there shouldn't be? Are we NOT entitled to life?
Reply
#4
(11-08-2017, 04:03 PM)incelaman Wrote: Why there shouldn't be? Are we NOT entitled to life?

I mean child benefits. There shouldn't be child benefits. If they want to have babies fed, Chad should hit the construction site and Stacy should hit the casting couch.
Quality over quantity.
Reply
#5
(11-08-2017, 04:03 PM)incelaman Wrote: Why there shouldn't be? Are we NOT entitled to life?

Nope. If you're a man, society is fine with you dying homeless. There is never going to be a "celibacy allowance". People going into blind rages just at the thought of single mothers on welfare, you think they'd allow male virgins to have it? There are people who want all forms of assistance cut because they'd rather have people die than be "free loaders".

Societal dysfunction is encouraged by design. It's easier to sell shit to people who are desperate and stressed out. And what's more stressful than risk of being homeless and penniless?
Reply
#6
I think children having a good future is more important than losing my virginity.
Reply
#7
Those who want it should get an escortceling allowance. Subsidized sex FTW.
31yo bald manlet escortcel 卐 'Self improvement is masturbation' | AKA BlackPill48
Take the Black Pill 1, 2, 3 - 57 minutes of greatness
Reply
#8
(11-08-2017, 04:22 PM)thechadgod69 Wrote: I think children having a good future is more important than losing my virginity.

It's the parents's repsonsibility not society's. We will never have sex so why shouldn't we get some money and live in coping?
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)